Movies


qos-teaserQuantum of Solace

Dir: Marc Forster

For some reason, some movies come out in Taiwan months after their North American release (like Tropic Thunder, which only opened on Oct. 31); others, though, come out early.  Quantum of Solace, Daniel Craig’s second celluloid foray as James Bond, happens to be one of those early ones, debuting here an entire week before it drops in the U.S. and Canada.  This makes literally no sense to me, but I’ll damn well take it; although, it’s been out for a week in Britain already, which makes me not all that special, but better than you lot, anyway.

(more…)

TIFF ‘o8: The Conclusioning

As promised in comment and post proper, here I present my closing thoughts on the festival that was Toronto 2008.  And only one month to the day after festival ended, which means one month and nine days after such a review would be useful, because really, what use would someone’s opinion about the quality of a film festival be at any point after that festival has begun?  What good’s a film review once it’s too late to see the film?  laebmada gets existential

(more…)

Cape No. 7

Dir: Te-sheng Wei (魏德聖)

When a tiny little movie that cost $50 million NTD ($1.6 million USD) to make earns over $350 million NTD (around $11.6 million USD) in just over a month to become the highest-grossing domestic film in Taiwanese history, you kind of have to go see it.

And it’s worth seeing.  While it falls prey to some of the same problems as any rom-com, there’s enough here to differentiate it from the norm and make it an entertaining film.  Not a great, outstanding film, but solidly decent.

(more…)

Well, well, well. Turns out I was right. First Darren Aronofsky gets the Venice FIlm Festival Best in Show. And now Danny Boyle gets the Golden Cadillac. Never doubt me again. I am laebmada!

On with my Toronto International Film Festival coverage. Surprises within!

(more…)

It’s been real hard, this total drought of culture we’ve all had to endure these past couple of months. Absolutely nothing to do, nothing to see and certainly nothing to write about. But finally, it is over. Another Toronto International Film Festival means a return to the glamorous world of unedited, unconsidered, sleep-deprived and consciousness-streamed film reviewership. It’s what I do best, because it’s what I do most easily.

This go-’round won’t be matching last year’s tally of eighteen movies; the foul responsibility of work prevents me from seeing any more than ten or eleven, alas. And the foul responsibility of havin’ other shit to do prevents me from taking up too much time discussing those ten or eleven films.

(more…)

By: Beal, graeme powell, James17930, Sarah P. & Tanya K.

Part I

Here we go again, cataloguing the last half of EW list of ‘new’ classic movies (don’t worry if you’re not quite sure what that means — after seeing what made the list and what didn’t, we’re not sure if they’re even sure).

Enjoy the ranting.

(more…)

By: Beal, graeme powell, James17930, Sarah P. & Tanya K.

Here’s a surprise: someone published a list on the Internet! This time around, it was convenience store impulse-rack mainstay Entertainment Weekly with their countdown of 100 “New Movie Classics.” By their definition, “new” includes only the last 25 years (sorry, Death Wish II!), which means that none of us writing this can be classified as “new” anymore. Which is sad: we bunch of non-new people, sitting at our computers, our bones aching, nitpicking an Entertainment Weekly online list. Textbook sad.

We’ll begin with selected numbers from 100 down to 50 (lists are here and here), and get to the remainder later.

(more…)

M is for GET YOUR HAND OUT OF MY ASS, HENSON.y month has been marked with more movies worth mentioning than most. In many moments, I’m of a mind to meander as I mouth off on motion pictures. But might I make the move to minimize my meditation, and motion to maintain a modest amount of mulling for these media as I masticate? Maybe… (more…)

I don’t think I have ever been more excited about a movie in my life. I also don’t think I have ever had as much trepidation about a movie before either. Even though I have recently found some troubling aspects in the original three features, I still cannot deny that they are among my favourite films. Raiders, Temple, and Last Crusade are comfort food, and an instant portal to childhood.

I never really wanted another Indiana movie. I felt that the finale of Last Crusade, the four heroes riding off into the sunset, made the perfect ending to the trilogy. So when rumours of a fourth began to circulate, and circulate, and then die down, and then circulate some more, I, to quote Indy, was beginning to have “a bad feeling about this.” I felt there was no way that they could make a movie as good as Raiders, or as good as Last Crusade (my personal favourite). Making a film better then Temple would not, in my mind, be much of an accomplishment. But I suppose the real threat, and I in no way hold the trinity of Spielberg, Lucas, and Ford accountable for this, was that there was no way they could make a movie as good as my childhood memories of the first three.

And they haven’t.

(more…)

C'mon, put your heart into it laddy!

Turns out, I am not the world’s only Indiana Jones fan. As a kid I would watch the first three Indy films (still sounds weird to say that) endlessly. The Temple of Doom was on TV last night, and S stopped on it for a second just as I came into the room to get something. I knew it was on without even looking at the screen, and I immediately quoted the next line of dialogue before the character had said it. I’ve watched them so many times that they are almost beyond criticism –- but, fortunately for you, dear reader, not quite. However, I have a dilemma. It has occurred to me of late that perhaps the Indiana Jones films, and TofD in particular, are not the out-and-out fun-filled spectacles that I took them to be so many years ago.

(more…)

Next Page »